Has acted on:

• the City of Vaughan’s New Official Plan, dealing with 145 appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board
• appeals to the City of Barrie’s Growth Management Official Plan dealing with an urban expansion of over 2000 hectares
• the City of Ottawa’s 5-year Official Plan review, respecting its urban boundary
• the approval of a residential condominium project in the Yonge Eglinton area
• the assembly, and redevelopment for a block in North York’s downtown for several hundred residential units, office and retail uses
• lease and public process issues affecting a major residential and commercial redevelopment project for a shopping centre in Alberta
• zoning issues for the establishment of millions of square feet of retail uses
• issues relating to several lengthy store wars hearings
• cost sharing disputes with a municipality involving the jurisdiction of the Board to resolve cost-sharing issues and impose them on a municipality
• a leading decision respecting the interplay between environmental assessment provisions and planning approvals by the Board
• a critical series of landfill related disputes about the potential expansion of the only landfill then serving Toronto, York Region and Durham Region. Established the jurisdiction of municipalities to enact zoning by-laws relating to landfills and their relationship to Certificates of Approval
• several disputes respecting alleged Provincially Significant Wetlands, natural heritage systems and the extent of the Board’s jurisdiction to control tree cutting
• litigation respecting allegations of abuse of public office by a municipality in the course of dealing with a residential subdivision
• litigation respecting the historical usage of unopened road allowances and municipal obligations to provide access over them
• litigation respecting forcing a municipality to open and maintain a road allowance providing access to an illegal residential community in a cottage zone
• the judicial review of a municipal restructuring which had taken effect, was ordered quashed and on subsequent proceedings on how to unwind the restructuring
• the litigation of a failed complex joint venture, ground lease development agreement for an entire block in downtown North York
• a building code appeal involving reliance on easement rights to establish sufficient spatial separation to meet building code requirements for unprotected openings
• the litigation of a commercial tenant’s liability under its lease for capital taxes levied against the landlord
• a challenge both in the Courts and before the Board to complex municipal arrangements to impose municipal charges exceeding the amounts permitted under the Development Charges Act
• a complex shopping centre title dispute including cross-easements and redevelopment projects which triggered both litigation and Board proceedings with the determination of the limits and inter-relationship of each
• a defamation trial and appeal involving statements made during the consideration of a development proposal
• how to deal with education development charges which had not been collected during a period when they had been declared unconstitutional, but later found to be constitutional on appeal